GLM-5.2-504B-Nvidia — REAP keep-168 of NVIDIA's official NVFP4 (no retraining)
A 34%-expert-pruned GLM-5.2, cut directly from
nvidia/GLM-5.2-NVFP4using the exact same REAP keep-168 expert selection as0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B. Whole-expert copy — NVIDIA's NVFP4 weights and scales are preserved bit-for-bit; no re-quantization, no fine-tuning.
This is a pure structural prune of NVIDIA's NVFP4 checkpoint. It keeps the highest-saliency 168 of
256 routed experts per layer and drops the rest. Unlike 0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B,
it is not Router-KD recovered — the router gates here are the original rows sliced down to the kept
experts. Use the recommended sampler guardrail below (it fully recovers pruning-induced looping for free).
What it is
GLM-5.2 is a GlmMoeDsaForCausalLM MoE — 78 layers (3 dense + 75 MoE) + 1 MTP layer,
256 routed experts per layer (top-8) + 1 shared expert, DeepSeek-style MLA attention with a DSA
sparse "indexer," hidden size 6144.
This model keeps 168 of the 256 routed experts per layer (≈504B params, down from ~744–763B),
uniformly across every MoE layer and the MTP layer (n_routed_experts: 168), so it loads and
serves cleanly in vLLM.
| Source | nvidia/GLM-5.2-NVFP4 (NVIDIA modelopt NVFP4) |
| Prune method | REAP — saliency = gate_weight × ‖expert_output‖, top-168 kept per layer |
| Expert selection | identical to 0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B (same REAP plan) |
| Recovery | none — raw structural prune (gates sliced, not KD-retrained) |
| Quantization | NVFP4 on routed experts (3–77) + FP8 KV cache, preserved verbatim from NVIDIA; MTP layer 78 BF16 |
| Params | ~504B (34% of routed experts pruned) |
How it was made
A direct safetensors transform — no GPU, no training, no re-quantization:
- For each MoE layer (3–78), keep the top-168 experts from the REAP saliency plan; copy each kept
expert whole so its NVFP4 packing (
weight,weight_scale,weight_scale_2,input_scale) travels intact. NVIDIA's quantized values are bit-identical to the source. - Renumber surviving experts
0..167and slice the router (gate.weight,gate.e_score_correction_bias) to the same 168 rows. - Everything else — attention, shared expert, norms, embeddings, the MTP block — is copied verbatim.
n_routed_expertsis set to 168.
The MTP (next-token / multi-token-prediction) layer is preserved at 168 experts, so self-speculative decoding still works.
Serving (vLLM)
vllm serve 0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B-Nvidia \
--tensor-parallel-size 8 \
--quantization modelopt_fp4 \
--kv-cache-dtype fp8 \
--trust-remote-code \
--max-model-len 262144
Recommended sampler guardrail — recover the loop cost for free
REAP pruning roughly doubles GLM-5.2's tendency to fall into repeat / </think>-restart loops (the
dominant agent-use failure mode). As established in the GLM-5.2-504B report,
this is fully recoverable at serving time with no retraining via a light sampler guardrail
(measured at n=2000 on the keep-168 cut):
min_p=0.05, repetition_penalty=1.05→ gentle, safe default.min_p=0.05, repetition_penalty=1.10→ drops looping to ~2.3% (below the unpruned teacher's raw 3.6%). Start at 1.05; go to 1.10 if you see loops.
Because this variant is not Router-KD recovered (the gates were not retrained), the guardrail is
strongly recommended rather than optional. For the KD-recovered variant with the full evaluation,
use 0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B.
Relationship to the GLM-5.2 REAP series
| model | source | recovery | use when |
|---|---|---|---|
0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B |
0xSero NVFP4 | Router-KD | you want the evaluated, recovered flagship |
| this model | NVIDIA NVFP4 | none | you want NVIDIA's exact quantization, pruned |
0xSero/GLM-5.2-REAP-504B-GGUF |
BF16 | — | llama.cpp / CPU / Metal |
📄 Method, evaluation, and the honest accounting of pruning cost: see the GLM-5.2-504B technical report.
Provenance & honesty
- Expert selection is the same REAP keep-168 plan that produced
0xSero/GLM-5.2-504B. - NVFP4 routed-expert weights/scales are NVIDIA's, unmodified (whole-expert copy; no re-quant).
- This specific variant was not separately re-evaluated; the behavioral numbers cited above come from the keep-168 cut in the linked report and are referenced as guidance, not as a fresh measurement of this checkpoint. It is not Router-KD recovered.
REAP expert-pruning applied to NVIDIA's NVFP4 GLM-5.2. Quantization by NVIDIA; pruning recipe from the GLM-5.2 REAP study.
Model discussions
Share what you know. Help others. Build trust.
Loading comments...
Keep it about the model. No spam, scams or personal attacks. Links are not allowed in comments or replies. Comment policy