language:
- ur license: apache-2.0 datasets:
- HuggingFaceFW/finepdfs_fw_edu_labeled
FinePDFs-Edu classifier (urd_Arab)
Model summary
This is a classifier for judging the educational value of web pages. It was developed to filter and curate educational content from web datasets and was trained on 197389 annotations generated by Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 for web samples from FinePDFs dataset.
We used this classifier to build FinePDFs-Edu dataset.
How to use in transformers
To load the FinePDFs-Edu classifier, use the following code:
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
import re
CHUNK_SIZE = 2048 - 2
MAX_CHARS = 10_000
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("HuggingFaceFW/finepdfs_edu_classifier_urd_Arab")
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("HuggingFaceFW/finepdfs_edu_classifier_urd_Arab")
regex_whitespace = re.compile(r'\s')
def create_text_chunks(text: str, tokenizer):
def trim_to_whitespace(text: str, trim_start: bool = True, trim_end: bool = True):
if trim_start:
match = regex_whitespace.search(text)
if match:
text = text[match.start()+1:]
else:
text = text[10:]
if trim_end:
match = regex_whitespace.search(text[::-1])
if match:
text = text[:len(text) - match.start() - 1]
else:
text = text[:-10]
return text
# First tokenize the text
# Speed hack, we take at most
if len(text) <= 2*MAX_CHARS:
tokens = tokenizer.encode(text[:MAX_CHARS], return_tensors="np", add_special_tokens=False)[0]
# Process the top chunks
chunks_from_top_sampled = [tokens[:CHUNK_SIZE]]
chunks_top_text = tokenizer.batch_decode(chunks_from_top_sampled, skip_special_tokens=True)
chunks_top_text = [trim_to_whitespace(chunks_top_text[0], trim_start=False, trim_end=True)]
return [chunks_top_text]
else:
# We tokenize the top and bottom of text
text_top = text[:MAX_CHARS]
text_bottom = text[-MAX_CHARS:]
tokens = tokenizer.batch_encode_plus([text_top, text_bottom], return_tensors="np", add_special_tokens=False)["input_ids"]
# This ensures that the second chunks is always maxed out
chunks = [tokens[0][:CHUNK_SIZE], tokens[1][-CHUNK_SIZE:]]
chunks_text = tokenizer.batch_decode(chunks, skip_special_tokens=True)
chunks_top_text = [trim_to_whitespace(chunks_text[0], trim_start=False, trim_end=True)]
chunks_bottom_text = [trim_to_whitespace(chunks_text[1], trim_start=True, trim_end=False)]
return chunks_top_text + chunks_bottom_text
text = "This is a test sentence." * 2000
chunks = create_text_chunks(text, tokenizer)
scores = []
for chunk in chunks:
inputs = tokenizer(chunk, return_tensors="pt", padding="longest", truncation=True)
outputs = model(**inputs)
logits = outputs.logits.squeeze(-1).float().detach().numpy()
score = logits.item()
scores.append(score)
print(max(scores))
Training
The classifier was trained on 104287 pairs of web samples and their scores from 0 to 5, generated by Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507. The samples were annotated based on their educational quality with 0 being not educational and 5 being highly educational.
Below is the prompt used for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 annotations:
Below is an extract from a PDF file. Evaluate whether the extract has a high educational
value and could be useful in an educational setting for teaching from primary school to
grade school levels using the additive 5-point scoring system described below. Points are
accumulated based on the satisfaction of each criterion:
- Add 1 point if the extract provides some basic information relevant to educational topics, even if it includes some irrelevant or non-academic content like advertisements and
promotional material.
- Add another point if the extract addresses certain elements pertinent to education but
does not align closely with educational standards. It might mix educational content with
non-educational material, offering a superficial overview of potentially useful topics, or
presenting information in a disorganized manner and incoherent writing style.
- Award a third point if the extract is appropriate for educational use and introduces key
concepts relevant to school curricula. It is coherent though it may not be comprehensive
or could include some extraneous information. It may resemble an introductory section of
a textbook or a basic tutorial that is suitable for learning but has notable limitations like
treating concepts that are too complex for grade school students.
- Grant a fourth point if the extract highly relevant and beneficial for educational purposes
for a level not higher than grade school, exhibiting a clear and consistent writing style. It
could be similar to a chapter from a textbook or a tutorial, offering substantial educational
content, including exercises and solutions, with minimal irrelevant information, and the
concepts aren’t too advanced for grade school students. The content is coherent, focused,
and valuable for structured learning.
- Bestow a fifth point if the extract is outstanding in its educational value, perfectly suited for
teaching either at primary school or grade school. It follows detailed reasoning, the writing
style is easy to follow and offers profound and thorough insights into the subject matter,
devoid of any non-educational or complex content.
The extract: {example}.
After examining the extract:
- Briefly justify your total score, up to 100 words.
- Conclude with the score using the format: "Educational score: <total points>"\
We added a classification head with a single regression output to jhu-clsp/mmBERT-base, unroze the last 4 layers and trained the model for 5000 steps with a learning rate of 3e-4.
Training Details:
- Model: jhu-clsp/mmBERT-base with a classification head
- Dataset: 104287 samples from Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 annotations
- Steps: 5000
- Learning Rate: 3e-4
- class distribution: {0: 29039, 1: 42800, 2: 19608, 3: 4280, 4: 4280, 5: 4280}
- Evaluation Metric: F1 score
Classification report
We treat the regression model's predictions as discrete classes to calculate the metrics on a hold-out set of 7894 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507-annotated samples.
Validation Report:
| class | precision | recall | f1-score | support |
|--------:|------------:|---------:|-----------:|----------:|
| 0 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.61 | 1162 |
| 1 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 5764 |
| 2 | 0.41 | 0.5 | 0.45 | 785 |
| 3 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 117 |
| 4 | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 62 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Confusion matrix
We verify that the predicted educational scores are indeed close to their ground truth, and are mostry impacted by the noisy annotation.
Confusion Matrix:
| class | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---------:|----:|-----:|----:|----:|----:|----:|
| 0 | 825 | 332 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 717 | 4531 | 502 | 12 | 2 | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | 330 | 396 | 48 | 7 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 10 | 59 | 36 | 11 | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 20 | 26 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Limitations
While the FinePDFs-Edu classifier performs well in distinguishing high-quality educational content for FinePDFs dataset, there are some limitations:
- Scope: The model's performance might change for other datasets, in particular for out of distribution samples. It is also focused on educational content relevant to primary and grade school levels and may not perform as well on content intended for higher education or specialized domains.
- Bias: The model's performance is dependent on the quality and representativeness of the training data and the LLM used for the annotation. Biases in both can affect the classifier's judgments. It might overfit to academic looking content for the higher scores and we recommend using int_score >= 1.35 (top 10% for english) as a threshold for data curation.
- Context: The classifier evaluates individual web pages or extracts without considering broader context, which might impact its effectiveness in certain scenarios.
The training and inference code is available on GitHub https://github.com/huggingface/finepdfs/tree/main/classification