Moon-Beam 16B-A3B · GGUF
Tablinum's first trained model. Moon-Beam is Moonlight-16B-A3B-Instruct (16B total, 3B active, MIT), fine-tuned to use the Tablinum-2 engram well. It reads the retrieved passages, answers from them when they state the answer, and says it doesn't know when they don't. With one search over all 26 engram tables and no routing, the 8 GB IQ3 build answers 406 of 502 held-out EngramBench questions correctly with 38 wrong (index +73.3, from −46.8 closed-book), and gets 155 wrong on SimpleQA where the untrained model gets 371.
Quick links: BF16 weights · Tablinum-2 engram · Moon-Beam collection · Lite-Beam family
What Moon-Beam is for
Moon-Beam is a private reference desk that runs on your own computer. Give it the Tablinum-2 knowledge library and it answers factual and how-to questions from 26 tables of reference text (Wikipedia, law and regulation, software documentation, home repair and DIY Q&A, philosophy, psychology, open textbooks, research papers), offline. When the passages don't hold the answer, it says it isn't sure instead of making one up.
Good uses:
- Looking things up without the internet: names, dates, definitions, what a law or regulation says, how an API or command works.
- Practical help at home: repairs, DIY, cooking and gardening, answered from real community Q&A.
- Studying and research: a careful companion that says what its sources say and admits gaps.
- Your own apps: an OpenAI-compatible endpoint (
llama-server,mlx_lm.server) plus the retrieval step.
Not for:
- Live information. It cannot browse the web or check news, prices or weather. It knows its training and the passages it is given.
- Tools and agents. Moon-Beam 16B does not call tools. Moon-Beam 8B (in training) adds tool calls, web-page actions and thinking.
- Long multi-step math (GSM8K 71.8%). Use the base model or a calculator tool.
- Medical, legal or financial decisions. It can explain what a source says; it does not replace a professional.
One quirk to know: asked "can you search the web?" or "can you run this code?", Moon-Beam 16B sometimes says yes. It can't. It only has its training and the passages you give it. We tested default system prompts that tell it so, and every one cost accuracy on easy facts (20 of 24 right with the original prompt, 13 to 17 with the new ones), so the chat template is unchanged. Moon-Beam 8B is trained to answer questions about itself correctly.
The knowledge library is a separate download today (Tablinum-2). Without it Moon-Beam is a careful general chat model; with it, it is the reference desk above. A one-command setup that installs both together is coming with the next release.
The result
| Held-out final (IQ3, paired) | untrained Moonlight | Moon-Beam | right / wrong with engram |
|---|---|---|---|
| EngramBench 502, all 26 tables | −58.6 → +65.1 | −46.8 → +73.3 | 406 / 38 (untrained 406 / 79) |
| SimpleQA-verified 1000 | −88.6 → +17.7 | −36.0 → +34.9 | 504 / 155 (untrained 548 / 371) |
| AA-Omniscience test 400 | −75.5 → −42.5 | −57.2 → −16.5 | 78 / 144 (untrained 96 / 266) |
The index is 100 × (correct − incorrect) / n, so a wrong answer costs as much as a right one earns. The engram supplies the knowledge. The training adds calibration: with the passages in hand Moon-Beam finds the answer about as often as its base, but it stops guessing when the passages don't hold it. All arms are graded by Claude Haiku against the gold answers, paired on the same questions; questions the grader declined to grade are dropped for both models. None of these questions, or any passage retrieved for them, was used in training.
What the engram knows
EngramBench is ours: 24 questions per subject, written from passages held out of training, each with a short gold answer that appears in its passage. One retrieval over all 26 tables finds the right subject's passage in the top 3 for 95% of questions, so no per-domain router is needed. Searching everything costs about one index point against sending each question to its own table.
Pick your pumpkin
| file | bytes | size | KLD vs BF16 (chat / wiki) | same top-1 | EngramBench own-table | SimpleQA + engram | use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Moon-Beam-16B-A3B-IQ2_XXS.gguf |
6,078,073,376 | 6.08 GB | 0.114 / 0.235 | 89.1% | +73.7 | +31.6 | smallest; fact recall with the engram |
Moon-Beam-16B-A3B-IQ3_XXS.gguf |
8,059,054,624 | 8.06 GB | 0.027 / 0.061 | 95.0% | +74.1 | +34.9 | recommended |
Moon-Beam-16B-A3B-IQ4_XS.gguf |
9,668,285,984 | 9.67 GB | 0.006 / 0.015 | 97.5% | +71.7 | +37.7 | long, practical answers |
All three use Tablinum's own importance matrix, computed on Moon-Beam itself, and per-tensor layouts: attention, the shared experts and
the dense first layer one level above the routed experts; ffn_down_exps (1408 columns) in 32-block types. KLD is measured against
Moon-Beam's own BF16 on assistant-turn tokens only. The 2-bit build keeps short factual answers but loses detail on long practical
answers (in our tests the full-precision model beat the 2-bit one 56 to 10 on home-repair advice), so prefer IQ3 or IQ4 for advice.
The full-precision weights are in BF16 weights.
How Moon-Beam was made
Moon-Beam is a QLoRA fine-tune: rank 16 on the MLA attention, the shared experts and the dense layer, with the 64 routed experts frozen. It trained one epoch on one 12 GB GPU, on 2,198 examples written by Claude Haiku from passages of the 21 non-health Tablinum-2 tables:
- answer (72%): the question with the gold passage hidden among near-misses → a grounded answer
- open / near-open (17%): how-to questions with no references, or with related passages that don't answer → a real answer
- decline (11%): fact lookups (a name, number or date) the passages don't state → "I'm not sure of that exact date". Never on how-to questions.
Health tables never left the machine. It took three rounds: the pilot learned to decline everything, and round two answered everything briefly and confidently. Round three, the recipe above, keeps both the help and the honesty.
What it costs
| general skill (IQ3, same prompt for both) | untrained Moonlight | Moon-Beam |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K (400, short chain of thought) | 83.5% | 71.8% |
| MMLU-Pro (700, 14 × 50, zero-shot letter) | 36.9% | 31.7% (35.8% on the 619 it answered with a letter) |
The training data is short factual and how-to answers, and it costs some general skill. Moon-Beam's math working is shorter and it skips steps more often, and it sometimes answers a multiple-choice question in a sentence instead of a letter. On the questions it does answer with a letter, MMLU-Pro knowledge is unchanged. If you need multi-step math, use the base model or route math to a tool.
Run locally
llama-server -m Moon-Beam-16B-A3B-IQ3_XXS.gguf --alias moon-beam \
-ngl 99 -fa on -c 32768 -ctk q8_0 -ctv q8_0 --jinja --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080
Use the v1 injection prompt with retrieved passages:
Reference passages (retrieved automatically; they may be incomplete or irrelevant): … Use a passage only if it states the answer to this exact question. A passage about a related but different item, version, year, rule or case does not answer it: then rely on your own knowledge, or say you don't know.
What you need
- GGUF: about 9 GB of VRAM for IQ3 with a 32K context (about 6 GB for IQ2). MLA keeps the KV cache small.
- BF16: about 32 GB of memory (GPU, or CPU with offload).
- Optional: the Tablinum-2 tables and retrieval code. The engram runs locally.
- Native context is 8K, as in Moonlight. Longer contexts were not trained for this release.
License and attribution
MIT. Moonlight-16B-A3B-Instruct is by Moonshot AI (MIT). Moon-Beam is a fine-tuned derivative by Lightspeed / Tablinum. Keep both copyright notices with any redistribution. Training examples were written with Claude Haiku, and the character art is Tablinum's own. No endorsement by Moonshot AI or Anthropic is implied.
Citation
@misc{moonbeam16b2026,
title = {Moon-Beam 16B-A3B},
author = {Lightspeed / tablinum},
year = {2026},
note = {Moonlight-16B-A3B fine-tuned to use the Tablinum-2 engram},
url = {https://huggingface.co/tablinum/Moon-Beam-16B-A3B}
}