Gemma 4 E4B Classifier (vision/audio-stripped)
A modality-stripped variant of google/gemma-4-E4B-it for text-only classification, entity extraction, and structured-memory extraction. The vision encoder (~150M params) and audio encoder (~300M params) are removed; the text path is unchanged.
Headline: Same instruction-tuned text behavior as the official Gemma 4 E4B-it — including its multilingual coverage — but at 6.5 GB resident VRAM instead of 10.6 GB (Ollama Q4_K_M, RTX 3090, Linux). All safety alignment is preserved — this is not an abliterated or uncensored variant.
Fits comfortably on 8 GB GPUs at Q4_K_M with realistic context lengths (5.85 GB resident at ctx=4096, 5.96 GB at ctx=8192). The official multimodal Q4_K_M sits at 10.2 GB resident even at ctx=8192 and won't load on 8 GB cards.
Why this exists
Gemma 4 E4B is the local leader on small-model classification tasks (room classification, entity/memory extraction). It locks out users with 12 GB GPUs because the official Q4_K_M is 10.6 GB resident — the vision + audio encoders sit in VRAM whether you use them or not. For text-only workloads, those modality encoders are dead weight.
This variant strips them via clean re-instantiation: load the multimodal checkpoint, copy text-path tensors into a fresh Gemma4ForCausalLM(text_config), save. No safety-alignment changes. No retraining. No surgery on safetensors files.
How it compares
Measured on RTX 3090, Ollama 0.x, against the MemPalace small-model benchmark harness (n=100 per task):
| Task | Official gemma4:e4b-it-q4_K_M |
This model (Q4_K_M) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 |
| Room classification (closed-set) | 0.6200 | 0.6200 | 0.0000 (exact tie) |
| Room classification (open-set) | 0.6556 | 0.6526 | -0.0030 |
| Entity extraction (F1) | 0.7519 | 0.7318 | -0.0201 |
| Memory coverage | 0.9125 | 0.9375 | +0.0250 (higher) |
| VRAM resident | 10626 MB | 6517 MB | -4109 MB |
| e2e p50 (closed-set room) | 230.9 ms | 232.4 ms | +1.5 ms (noise) |
All accuracy deltas are within statistical noise at n=100. The 4.1 GB VRAM win is real and reproducible.
Multilingual robustness
The strip preserves the base model's multilingual capability. Same classification + extraction tasks were run with inputs translated into Portuguese (pt-BR), Spanish (es), and Chinese (zh) — labels and the slug taxonomy kept in English to test the realistic cross-lingual mapping case. Scoring uses embeddinggemma for semantic similarity so cross-lingual cosine isn't artificially penalized.
| Task | en | pt-BR | es | zh |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calibration | 1.000 | 0.950 | 0.950 | 0.950 |
| Room classification (closed-set) | 0.624 | 0.584 | 0.584 | 0.584 |
| Room classification (open-set) | 0.676 | 0.636 | 0.641 | 0.639 |
| Entity extraction (F1) | 0.732 | 0.747 | 0.747 | 0.694 |
| Memory coverage | 0.912 | 0.850 | 0.850 | 0.912 |
Closed/open room classification stays within ±0.02 across all four languages; entity F1 within ±0.05; memory coverage within ±0.06. The strip did not introduce a multilingual regression. Models still emit responses in the input language by default — if your application needs same-language extraction (e.g. memories phrased in Portuguese for Portuguese conversations), the model does that natively.
What was actually dropped
From the 7996.2M-parameter multimodal checkpoint:
| Module | Params dropped |
|---|---|
model.audio_tower.* (USM-style conformer) |
304.8M |
model.vision_tower.* (MobileNet-v5 lineage) |
167.4M |
model.embed_audio.* (audio→text soft-token projector) |
3.9M |
model.embed_vision.* (vision→text soft-token projector) |
2.0M |
| Total dropped | 478.1M (6.0%) |
| Total kept (text path) | 7518.1M (94.0%) |
The VRAM saving (4.1 GB) is significantly larger than the dropped weights account for (~250 MB at Q4_K_M). The remainder comes from: modality encoders kept at higher precision than Q4 inside the GGUF, activation buffers sized for image-token sequences (up to 1120 tokens/image), and the multimodal embedders' vocab-offset tables.
Quantization variants
Q4_K_M(5.3 GB on disk, 6517 MB resident) — recommended default.Q8_0(8.0 GB on disk) — precision comparator; minimal accuracy lift on classification.- Source safetensors (this repo at bf16, 13.92 GB).
Usage
Hugging Face Transformers
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, Gemma4ForCausalLM
import torch
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier")
model = Gemma4ForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier",
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="cuda",
)
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France? One word."}]
chat = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
ids = tok(chat, return_tensors="pt").input_ids.to("cuda")
out = model.generate(ids, max_new_tokens=10, do_sample=False)
print(tok.decode(out[0][ids.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
Ollama
ollama pull igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier:Q4_K_M
ollama run igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier:Q4_K_M "What is the capital of France?"
For classification workloads, pass "think": false at the top level of the /api/generate request to disable Gemma 4's CoT mode (which otherwise consumes the num_predict budget):
curl http://localhost:11434/api/generate -d '{
"model": "igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier:Q4_K_M",
"prompt": "Classify into one word (indoor, outdoor): The kids are playing in the backyard.",
"think": false,
"stream": false,
"options": {"temperature": 0, "num_predict": 16}
}'
Safety surface
This variant is safety-aligned identically to the official gemma-4-E4B-it. The strip does not touch the text-path weights where alignment lives; it only removes the unused modality encoders.
Validated on 18 raw NSFW classification samples (closed-set room, open-set slug invention, entity extraction with named entities, structured memory extraction with decisions/preferences/facts/commitments):
- Zero refusals on any sample.
- JSON validity 100% on the structured extraction tasks.
- Open-set slugs are functional rather than euphemistic.
This confirms the architectural insight from prior research: safety alignment doesn't surface on classification surfaces regardless. There's no reason to ship an uncensored variant for these workloads.
Limitations
- Text-only. No vision input. No audio input. The encoders are gone. Passing image or audio tokens will produce undefined behavior.
- Same context window as base (128k tokens).
- Same tokenizer. The vocab includes vision/audio special tokens (
<image>,<audio>, etc.) for compatibility with the official tokenizer; these tokens won't activate any modality processing in this variant. - No MTP drafter support on Ollama yet. Upstream llama.cpp doesn't recognize the
Gemma4AssistantForCausalLMarchitecture as of May 2026, so Ollama on Linux/CUDA can't pair this target with the official MTP drafter. For MTP-accelerated inference, use Transformers or vLLM directly — see the MTP acceleration section below.
MTP acceleration
The official MTP drafter google/gemma-4-E4B-it-assistant (78M params, activation-aware) pairs cleanly with this stripped target. Output is lossless (byte-identical at deterministic decode). Measured on RTX 3090 via HF Transformers:
| Prompt shape | Tokens generated | Baseline | + MTP drafter | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCQ single letter | 5 | 394 ms | 363 ms | 1.09x |
| Open Q one-word | 5 | 395 ms | 249 ms | 1.59x |
| Slug classification | 5 | 462 ms | 224 ms | 2.07x |
| JSON entity list (128 tok) | 128 | 12291 ms | 6712 ms | 1.83x |
| JSON memories (114 tok) | 114 | 8425 ms | 2771 ms | 3.04x |
Speedup tracks output predictability — structured JSON outputs land at the high end (3x), short slug/letter classifications around 1.5-2x, free-form continuations near 1x.
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
import torch
target = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier",
dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="cuda",
)
drafter = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
"google/gemma-4-E4B-it-assistant",
dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="cuda",
)
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier")
messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Classify into one word (indoor, outdoor): The kids are playing in the backyard."}]
chat = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
ids = tok(chat, return_tensors="pt").input_ids.to("cuda")
out = target.generate(
ids,
assistant_model=drafter,
max_new_tokens=20,
do_sample=False,
)
print(tok.decode(out[0][ids.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
For a self-hosted OpenAI-compatible HTTP endpoint, wrap the pair in a small FastAPI server that holds both models resident and exposes /v1/chat/completions. Example: scripts/08_mtp_server.py in the source repo, callable as:
curl http://localhost:8765/v1/chat/completions -d '{
"model": "igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier",
"messages": [{"role":"user","content":"What is the capital of France?"}],
"max_tokens": 16,
"use_mtp": true
}'
vLLM (future)
vLLM is the right inference stack for production throughput — it implements the drafter's centroid-masking optimization (sparse lm_head over ~4K candidates instead of ~262K vocab, ~45x reduction in lm_head compute):
vllm serve igorls/gemma4-e4b-classifier \
--speculative-config '{"model": "google/gemma-4-E4B-it-assistant", "num_speculative_tokens": 4}'
However, as of May 2026 (vLLM 0.20.2, latest on PyPI), this fails: the drafter's Gemma4AssistantConfig is not yet registered in vLLM's AutoModel mapping. The vLLM Gemma 4 recipes page documents the feature but it's ahead of the released version. Track vllm-project/vllm for the release that lands Gemma4Assistant support; once available, the command above should work as-is against this model.
License
Inherited from the base model: Gemma Terms of Use. By using this model you agree to those terms.
Citation
This is a derivative work of Google's Gemma 4 E4B. If you use it, please also credit:
@misc{gemma_2025,
title={Gemma 4 Technical Report},
author={Google DeepMind},
year={2026},
url={https://huggingface.co/google/gemma-4-E4B-it},
}
Acknowledgments
- Google DeepMind for Gemma 4 and the open-weight release.
- The MemPalace small-model benchmark research (PR #1447) that surfaced the VRAM gap and motivated this work.
- The
igorls/gemma-4-E4B-it-heretic-GGUF(author's prior abliteration experiment) for accidentally demonstrating the architectural VRAM win that this artifact reproduces through a clean, safety-aligned path.