A great deal of experimentation and testing has now been done on this model. It is more than capable of handling categorization, classification, text masking, similarity detection, similarity offset comparison, and many more tasks that I haven't listed.

It's small, so the cracks show. I have plans for a much more diverse categorical array with a much larger set of symbolic tokens for a version 2 of this model with a more expansive set of masking processes to train it; each more carefully tuned to not damage the alternative pretrained pathways.

SEMANTIC TOKEN STATISTICS:

Average similarity between tokens: 0.232

Std dev of similarities: 0.043

Max similarity: 0.368

Min similarity: 0.082

Most similar token pairs:

<intent> ↔ <style>: 0.368

<hair_style> ↔ <hair_length>: 0.336

<grid> ↔ <fabric>: 0.316

<footwear> ↔ <jewelry>: 0.315

<grid> ↔ <offset>: 0.315

SHUNT TOKEN STATISTICS:

Average distance between shunts: 1.146

Std dev of distances: 0.040

Min distance: 1.056

Max distance: 1.262

CATEGORY ANALYSIS:

Subject/Object:

Tokens: 5

Avg within-category similarity: 0.234

Appearance:

Tokens: 4

Avg within-category similarity: 0.260

Clothing:

Tokens: 5

Avg within-category similarity: 0.280

Material/Texture:

Tokens: 5

Avg within-category similarity: 0.251

Spatial/Style:

Tokens: 7

Avg within-category similarity: 0.270

DIMENSIONALITY ANALYSIS:

Variance explained by first 10 PCs: 37.6%

Components needed for 90% variance: 1

Release - bert-beatrix-2048 v1

Entirely saturated pretrained masking window, fixated on expanding the masking potential using subject and shunt allocation tokenization systems.

What we have here, is our first subject burned saturated rope prototype - though I must admit it took longer than expected to train, will provide a perfect excitation catalyst for the next step.

After more research, I learned I could probably saturate this context window in a fraction of the steps - however, this is a full pretrain burn, so I let it go the distance.

There is much to be learned here - especially with diffusion embedding shaping.

There may be faults in it's core, I've had some issues with the vocab and tokenization structure having a valuation misalignment, however I decided nonetheless to let it complete with those faults intact. There's no telling what that may teach alongside. The actual data itself should reflect the correct tokenization, I just need to make sure it loads correctly. If not, I'll retrain her.

2008000 total steps at batch size 1024.

This is the 26 categorical finetune of nomic-bert-2048's encoder.

• 130,000,000 - 4-30 masked token samples with 80% mask rate
• • Learned timestep associative noise and why it matters.
• 253,952,000 - 77 token samples with 20% mask rate
• • Learned context over the noise.
• 775,000,000 - 144-256 token samples with 30% mask rate
• 453,800,000 - 385-512 token samples with 30% mask rate
• 227,328,000 - 1024 token samples with 30% mask rate
• 234,112,000 - 2048 token samples with 30% mask rate

The final accuracy is about 95% give or take, but it's also comparing against the actual pretrained data. The point being it needs to associate information with information more cleanly, rather than fully enforcing the various logistical and subjective elements instantiated from external elements.

Total samples; 2,056,192,000

The model has learned to categorize certain masked patterns with their categories and special tokens.

It turns WHAT YOU WANT into something A BIT more reliable - in a vector-rich modality meant to be subjectively cohesive and applied to categorize SOMETHING ELSE for processing and decoding.

This will likely result in many variant and incorrect pathways if you try to use it as an LLM, or if you try to use it to TRAIN an LLM. However, I'm going to do it anyway, because I can.

---

HOWEVER, the deterministic nature of subjectivity... will have a very crucial role when being shaped by... much more intelligent harmonic influence.

The REAL experiment can now start.

<subject>
<subject1>
<subject2>
<pose>
<emotion>
<surface>
<lighting>
<material>
<accessory>
<footwear>
<upper_body_clothing>
<hair_style>
<hair_length>
<headwear>
<texture>
<pattern>
<grid>
<zone>
<offset>
<object_left>
<object_right>
<relation>
<intent>
<style>
<fabric>
<jewelry>

With the categorical shunts;

[SHUNT_1000000]
[SHUNT_1000001]
[SHUNT_1000002]
[SHUNT_1000003]
[SHUNT_1000004]
[SHUNT_1000005]
[SHUNT_1000006]
[SHUNT_1000007]
[SHUNT_1000008]
[SHUNT_1000009]
[SHUNT_1000010]
[SHUNT_1000011]
[SHUNT_1000012]
[SHUNT_1000013]
[SHUNT_1000014]
[SHUNT_1000015]
[SHUNT_1000016]
[SHUNT_1000017]
[SHUNT_1000018]
[SHUNT_1000019]
[SHUNT_1000020]
[SHUNT_1000021]
[SHUNT_1000022]
[SHUNT_1000023]
[SHUNT_1000024]
[SHUNT_1000025]

Each shunt meant to activate cross-categorical conceptualization within their 77 token window.